/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/45660080/usa-today-8355190.0.jpg)
The Hogs finally broke the dam open last week, winning both SEC games by 20 points. With the defense playing well, the Hogs are only a reliable three-point shooter away from looking like a team capable of a tournament run.
Arkansas | Miss State | |
Points | 61 | 41 |
Efficiency | 0.87 | 0.57 |
Floor % | 41.43% | 33.33% |
Effective FG % | 41.41% | 31.11% |
Two FG % | 45.24% | 40.00% |
Three FG % | 22.73% | 0.00% |
Offensive Rebound % | 25.00% | 29.03% |
Turnover % | 15.71% | 33.33% |
Assists : Turnovers | 1.27 | 0.33 |
Mississippi State's gameplan to drive in the lane, throw up junk, and pray for a foul didn't work on the road, as it rarely does. State's lack of shooters (0 of 10 from beyond the arc) and ballhandlers (24 turnovers) doomed the Bulldogs from the beginning.
Arkansas possession efficiency score | |||||||
BALLHANDLERS | Points | Off. Rebs | Steals | FG Attempts | FT Attempts | Turnovers | Score |
Rashad Madden | 7 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1.20 |
Anton Beard | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1.00 |
Jabril Durham | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.50 |
SHOOTERS | Points | Off. Rebs | Steals | FG Attempts | FT Attempts | Turnovers | Score |
Michael Qualls | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0.30 |
Anthlon Bell | 12 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1.40 |
Manuale Watkins | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 |
FORWARDS | Points | Off. Rebs | Steals | FG Attempts | FT Attempts | Turnovers | Score |
Bobby Portis | 19 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1.45 |
Alandise Harris | 9 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1.29 |
Jacorey Williams | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 |
Moses Kingsley | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.20 |
Welcome back, Anthlon Bell! The usually stone-cold shooter was 4 of 8 from beyond the arc for 12 points. Portis was dominant, and Madden and Harris chipped in some offense as well. Qualls continued to struggle, as did Williams. There are way too many scores below 1.1 on this chart (that's the baseline of a decent game), something that needs to improve.
Closing it out
By my count, Arkansas probably needs a 12-6 finish in SEC play to guarantee a quality seed in the NCAA Tournament. A record of 11-7 could be sufficient with no really bad losses, but 12-6 is Arkansas' best bet. Here are my guesses on how that should happen:
- Must-wins: Missouri (home), Mississippi State (road), Texas A&M (home)
- Win 2 of these: Auburn (road), South Carolina (road), Ole Miss (road), LSU (home)
- Lose: Kentucky (road)
Texas A&M provides a necessary top 100 win, while Missouri and Mississippi State are too bad to lose to. I do not expect wins in Lexington or Oxford. I do expect wins over Auburn and LSU, meaning that the South Carolina road game is the difference between 12-6 and 13-5. If the Hogs do lose Tuesday at Auburn, then the South Carolina game takes on increased importance, making it nearly a must-win.
Previewing Auburn
Record | RPI | vs. top 50 | vs. top 100 | |
Arkansas | 18-5 | 22nd | 3-2 | 7-5 |
Auburn | 11-12 | 141st | 2-3 | 3-8 |
Auburn sprung a road upset of LSU, but it's the Plains Tigers' only road win. They've picked off Xavier on the Plains and Oregon State (RPI: 71st) out of conference, but close home wins over South Carolina and Missouri are their only other SEC wins.
Name | Position | Height | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG % | 3FG % |
K.T. Harrell* | G | 6-4 | 17.5 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.463 | 0.451 |
Antoine Mason* | G | 6-1 | 15.2 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.425 | 0.372 |
Cinmeon Bowers* | F | 6-7 | 13.5 | 11.1 | 1.3 | 0.432 | - |
Tahj Shamsid-Deen* | G | 5-9 | 6.1 | - | 1.5 | 0.348 | 0.286 |
K.C. Ross-Miller | G | 6-1 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.336 | 0.217 |
Malcolm Canada | G | 6-3 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 0.370 | - |
Jordon Granger* | F | 6-8 | 4.8 | 3.3 | - | 0.488 | - |
Alex Thompson | F | 6-8 | 2.8 | 1.8 | - | 0.270 | - |
"They don't have much height" is a phrase often thrown around overused, but Auburn is one of teams the moniker can accurately be ascribed to. Really, outside of Bowers, Auburn has no quality big men. Granger and Thompson are not SEC quality forwards, the amount of time they have to play is indicative of what Bruce Pearl is working with.
Harrell and Mason will handle most of the scoring. Both are decent jump-shooters, but they're the only quality jump-shooters Auburn has. Bowers is a 278-pound behemoth in the low post. He can score and rebound, but he's not very mobile and is a very poor defender in the post without fouling. Teams have had a ton of success exploiting Auburn's defense by going straight to the rim. Portis should run circles around Bowers and the Hogs should rebound a high percentage of their misses.
Arkansas offensive overview | |||
Arkansas offense | Auburn defense | Advantage | |
Efficiency | 1.08 (33rd) | 1.00 (190th) | Arkansas big |
Floor % | 52.0% (23rd) | 48.5% (228th) | Arkansas big |
Auburn's defense is pretty bad, especially in floor percentage (which is Arkansas' strength). They are the opposite of Tennessee, a team that gives up a ton of three-pointers, hurting efficiency more than floor percentage. Auburn just gives up a bunch of close-range shots and free throws.
Arkansas shooting | |||
Arkansas offense | Auburn defense | Advantage | |
Effective Field Goal % | 50.3% (118th) | 50.7% (249th) | Arkansas big |
Two Point % | 49.3% (113th) | 52.3% (311th) | Arkansas big |
Three Point % | 35.1% (124th) | 31.7% (73rd) | Auburn |
Three Point Rate | 30.3% (274th) | 32.9% (138th) | - |
If Portis isn't licking his lips over that two-point defense of Auburn, he should be. Bowers' immobility and Auburn's lack of another quality forward means that getting open shots near the rim shouldn't be too much of a challenge. Auburn's guards are quick and can defend three-pointers. Arkansas has to avoid settling for long shots. Auburn's total lack of depth inside should be hurt by a fast pace and fouls.
Arkansas ballhandling | |||
Arkansas offense | Auburn defense | Advantage | |
Assist % | 59.8% (47th) | 47.5% (38th) | Push |
Turnover % | 16.3% (36th) | 21.7% (31st) | Push |
Assist : Turnover Ratio | 1.41 (11th) | 0.76 (28th) | Push |
Turnover alert: Auburn forces them. This is the Tigers' primary strength. Arkansas got roasted in both Tennessee games and at Florida, but easily eluded South Carolina's press. Avoiding turnovers is a must.
Auburn offensive overview | |||
Auburn offense | Arkansas defense | Advantage | |
Efficiency | 0.97 (225th) | 0.94 (72nd) | Arkansas big |
Floor % | 46.5% (210th) | 45.0% (76th) | Arkansas big |
Auburn is a poor offensive team. The Tigers get a decent amount of points because of their fast pace (shots by volume, similar to Arkansas) but are not very efficient. Arkansas' defense has climbed a staggering 180 spots (from 256th) since the Ole Miss debacle.
Auburn shooting | |||
Auburn offense | Arkansas defense | Advantage | |
Effective Field Goal % | 47.0% (252nd) | 48.3% (146th) | Arkansas |
Two Point % | 44.6% (288th) | 47.3% (158th) | Arkansas big |
Three Point % | 33.9% (180th) | 33.6% (157th) | Push |
Three Point Rate | 38.3% (72nd) | 32.5% (126th) | - |
Arkansas' last three opponents are 9 of 52 from beyond the arc. The Tigers, especially Harrell, can hit from three, and that's much of what Auburn does. If the Tigers can't crack 35 percent it's hard to see them hanging around. Inside the arc, they don't shoot very well, the result of a lack of size (7.9 percent of their shots are blocked, 325th nationally).
Auburn ballhandling | |||
Auburn offense | Arkansas defense | Advantage | |
Assist % | 48.5% (266th) | 51.6% (130th) | Arkansas big |
Turnover % | 19.2% (190th) | 22.2% (26th) | Arkansas big |
Assist : Turnover Ratio | 0.79 (289th) | 0.76 (29th) | Arkansas big |
Ballhandling isn't a strength for the Tigers either, although they are better than South Carolina and Mississippi State. Arkansas has forced turnovers like crazy lately, and that would be a good trend to continue Tuesday.
Rebounding | |||
Arkansas | Auburn | Advantage | |
Arkansas offensive | 35.3% (23rd) | 66.7% (312th) | Arkansas big |
Arkansas defensive | 71.6% (145th) | 27.8% (209th) | Arkansas |
A total lack of size and mobile big men means that grabbing defensive rebounds isn't a strength. Arkansas rebounded 50 percent of its misses against Alabama and 40 percent against Missouri, allowing the Razorbacks to win both games despite shooting worse from the floor. Since that game, however, offensive rebounding has fallen off (and so has offensive production). If the Hogs can get back to 40 percent, Auburn may not be able to overcome it.
Fouls | |||
Arkansas | Auburn | Advantage | |
Arkansas drawing | 25.9% (263rd) | 29.7% (281st) | Push |
Arkansas committing | 25.0% (61st) | 30.6% (26th) | Push |
Auburn games tend to be foulfests, with the Tigers drawing a bunch of fouls and also fouling a ton. Arkansas is the opposite, preferring low-foul games. There's no way to predict how the referees will call this one, but expect Auburn to be the beneficiary of whatever happens.
Keys to the Game
- Crash the offensive glass. Arkansas hasn't rebounded well since the Missouri game, and it's shown with a dropoff in scoring. Auburn will play zone and doesn't have much height, so the opportunities will be there. A good goal is 40 percent of misses.
- Force turnovers. Auburn is susceptible to turning the basketball over. The Tigers launch a ton of three-pointers, so turnovers can be a way to disrupt rhythm. Arkansas had long stretches earlier in conference play where it didn't force any turnovers. That can't continue on Tuesday, because Auburn has a chance if they can get a bunch of shots up.
- Don't turn it over. The other side of the coin is not falling victim to Auburn's press. The only thing the Tiger defense does well is force turnovers. If Arkansas takes care of the basketball, this should be an easy win.